Breitbart “The White House is promoting the expansion of Medicaid through Obamacare as one way to prevent more gun violence, and urging Republicans to join forces with the president.”
Spokesman Josh Earnest explained to reporters during the White House press briefing; “For those who say they want to work with the administration in limiting gun violence, we would welcome the support for the Affordable Care Act and expanding Medicaid.”
Obama and his liberal minions realize they will not overthrow our Constitution and they can never pass enough new laws to eliminate 2nd Amendment rights. There are too many doors to break down to find everyone’s weapons.
They are looking for the best ways to confiscate your guns. Now health care is part of it.
.
Breitbart- WH: Republicans Should Support Obamacare Expansion To Prevent Mass Shootings
Burst Updates 
Brittius
October 6, 2015
Reblogged this on Brittius and commented:
Hey, Amigo! We don’t need, no stinkin’ ObamaCare!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lisa V
October 7, 2015
go ahead take my or rather your health care back, I never wanted it.. it would cost me 566.00 to keep it anyway… go ahead and save me some money… dont know abou you, but i would rather keep my security, thank you very much…
LikeLiked by 2 people
night-stalker
October 8, 2015
i cant even AFFORD OBAMACARE & IF I COULD I COULDNT AFFORD ITS COPAYS FOR HARDLY ANY COVERAGE…ILL KEEP MY WEAPONS TY ANYWAY
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ron Marquis
October 7, 2015
Either spokesperson Josh Earnest doesn’t know how to frame a sentence properly or he has been misquoted. “For those who say they want to work with the administration in limiting gun violence, we would welcome the support for the Affordable Care Act and expanding Medicaid”. WHAT?? I have no idea what the point of the sentence is. Other than the fact that gun control, the ACA and Medicaid are mentioned in the same sentence, how does the author of this posting find some sinister connection between them within the statement? How do supporting the ACA and expanding Medicaid relate to an attempt at increasing gun control? Something is missing here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joe Pettis
October 8, 2015
He wants to make people turn in their guns in order to keep their Obamacare/Medicaid.
LikeLike
Ron Marquis
October 8, 2015
I have no doubt that’s the message, but the headline and content of the article are so disjointed that it doesn’t come across very well. If the writer is trying to convince us of something, it’s a poor job. He or she is simply telling readers his or her opinion with little persuasive support.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Johanna
October 9, 2015
The stupidity of the plan is so blatant that it needs no explanation.
LikeLike
S R S P (@TsunamiDaisy)
October 11, 2015
I think he is actually promising libs more medicaid and healthcare if they back him on this taking our guns thing.
LikeLike
larioransomi
October 8, 2015
How do we know this? It’s not clear in the article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thinking Mammal
October 10, 2015
Unless you’re black, a Muslim, or a union member…
LikeLike
Juanell
November 19, 2016
I am very poor, so I am on Medicaid. I have never shot anybody, so why should I have to give up my gun to keep my Medicaid that I have been on for years? That is a big crock of crap.
LikeLike
larioransomi
October 8, 2015
I was wondering the same thing.
LikeLike
GretaSue
October 9, 2015
I guess if you give them more free stuff they will give you their gun? lolol
LikeLike
barb
October 7, 2015
No way!! THIS IS BLACKMAIL!! GUNS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTHCARE.
JUST LOOK AT CHICAGO, TOUGHEST GUN LAWS AND WORST STATISTICS FOR SHOOTINGS!!
JUST ANOTHER WAY TO MAKE US LIKE THE CITIZENS OF GERMANY. …UNABLE TO DEFEND OURSELVES WHEN HE DECIDES TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW AND COME FOR THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH HIM!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
mason michael
October 8, 2015
I like your comment… But its patently false.
Im no skinhead, but I must point out that Adolf Hitler, not only NEVER took away germanys guns. He actually lifted gun restrictions.
And also never declared martial law as its called.. The Riechstag approved “the enabling act” after the Riechstag was burned down…
But he never banned guns for german citizens..
Just so you know
LikeLike
George
October 7, 2015
Hello All.. I agree with Ron Marquis, the title sentence makes no sense. What does healthcare .. have to do with guns confiscation. If the the title was “Give up guns OR loose ObO-care”,, that would make sense and by the same token agree with Lisa V. KEEP your silly ass costly/deadly health care! WE DIDN’T want shoved down our throats in the first place and DON’T want anything this corrupt administration has to offer!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Martha Lee Vincent
October 8, 2015
DON’T VOTE FOR ANY CANDIDATE WHO WANTS TO TIE OUR HEALTH CARE TO GIVING UP OUR GUNS, OUR ONLY PROTECTION AGAINST THE TERRORISTS AND ILLEGALS OBAMA IS FLOODING OUR COUNTRY WITH !!!
LikeLike
Bill
October 8, 2015
What a horrible fear mongering article, it makes no sense at all and provides no facts at all.
LikeLike
Lala Lummus
October 8, 2015
ROTFFLMAO that is so funny because we never complied to obamacare and never will comply to that atrocity and nope we will never give up our guns. Does he think obamacare is the end of the world that is the worst piece of crap there this country ever had. With such a threat he might get more people to buy guns. ROTFFLMAO.
LikeLike
William
October 8, 2015
I’ve been saying that they would try this for a long time now. It wouldn’t just be limited to guns but whatever else government wanted to do: if they controlled access to health care, they could simply deny access until the person complied.
LikeLike
Teresa
October 8, 2015
F*** Obama and his threats!! I pay for my own private health care! Besides, even if I did have Obama health care, I’d tell him to take it away and shove it where the sun don’t shine. I’ll choose to keep my family and myself protected over any costly insurance that won’t pay for death benefits if anybody gets shot by some illegal Mexican, terrorist Muslim, or a crooked law breaking citizen!
LikeLike
Dave
October 8, 2015
When are they going to impeach his ass?
LikeLike
Kevin P Sullivan
October 8, 2015
Here is what they are learning in Russian High Schools and youth group programs.. While In the US Under The Democratic Party and Barack Obama’s Administrations Timeline its main priority is to teach from grammar schools through High School and All government run colleges, community colleges and all type of educational institution Programs the compliance of foreign non religious belief systems in preparation for Sharia law while wearing a Crucifix or Star of David or American patriotic apparel ,garments or clothing are suspendable offenses but everyday appropriate attire consist of structure uniforms and or 7 types of Muslim headwear with hijab and niqab. islamic dresses for their religions and privacy purposes… and as of this year all public schools are NOW mandating the teaching of our infant children and kids the acceptance of sodomy and oral Behavior for both young Boys and Girls with detail on experimental and instructions on cross-dressing and the unmonitored behavioral patterns of the gay lesbian transgender community and how to put condoms on a cucumber as a leaning tool . Thank you libtards??? most schools today require students to sign a confidentiality clause agreement that prohibits parents or guardians from attending classes or entering school grounds unaccompanied during structural private behavioral learning please visit the schools regularly without announcing or telling the child or teacher that you will be attending that day you can also Try forgetting to give your child Their needed Books or lunch so you have an excuse to see them at any given time Read on AK-74: Fast Assembly & Disassembly In all Russian Schools https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek ?? read Why Are Schools Banning Mom and Dad? http://www.parentalrights.org/index.asp?SEC=9BF23C6F-9E5C-4418-B985-6381AACC6907&Type=B_BASIC
LikeLike
HEG
October 8, 2015
Obama has now committed extortion as this is what it is, well Mr. Obama “Communist Jackass” take Obamacare and shove it up your ass. If congress allows this they will face just what you are facing which is unemployment as “We the People” have had enough of your abuse and to use healthcare as a threat to the American people is unconstitutional and will allow the American people to demand that CONGRESS IMPEACH your sorry ass and put you where you and the black panthers and Eric Holder belong. Shove that thought of using our health insurance as a threat just shows how low of a snake you are and I will say this, your giving Muslims housing grants, inviting more illegals to come into our nation and now this demonstrates that you are a lying, piece of horse shit and if Congress won’t impeach you than we shall have another civil war and you will see just how Americans hate your guts.
LikeLike
Matt
October 8, 2015
Don’t need your bullshit health care.
LikeLike
Mary B
October 8, 2015
This is blatant extortion. If he does that there’s a good chance this may be his undoing. An impeachable offense that will stick.
LikeLike
barleywheets
October 8, 2015
Maybe being 51% white(mommy), ( 43% Arab, and only 6% black- daddy), makes for a thin skinned “1st black corrupt fraudulent constitutionally illegal president”?
treasonous obama is a corrupt fraudulent terrorist criminal!!!!
Presidential elections are not popularity contests and we need to stop treating them as such. The Constitutional “natural born citizen” eligibility criteria was put there by our forefathers to protect us from being “presided over” by and (most importantly) our military commanded by an individual with potentially dual allegiances. Our abandonment of the “natural born citizen” criteria has resulted in precisely the dire consequences our forefathers foresaw, and “Exhibit A” of those dire consequences currently ILLEGALLY OCCUPIES the Oval Office, has little or no allegiance to America, and goes by the names Barry Soetoro aka Barack Soebarkah aka Harrison Bounel aka Barack Hussein Obama.
OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE!!! Obama is a USURPER who (aided and abetted by political and media powers-that-be) has perpetrated the biggest hoax against American citizens in the history of our nation! Anything Obama says, signs or does including laws, executive orders and bills are NULL and VOID because Obama is legally NOT the President! We have NOT had a legal President since 2008! When a child inherits the citizenship of their father, they become a natural-born citizen of the nation their father belongs regardless of where they might be born. It should be pointed out that citizenship through descent of the father was recognized by U.S. Naturalization law whereby children became citizens themselves as soon as their father had become a naturalized citizen, or were born in another country to a citizen father. BOTH PARENTS must have been U.S. CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH in order for a Presidential hopeful to qualify as a “natural born citizen” under our U.S. Constitution!! Natural born” is VERY different from any other category of citizenship, i.e. “native born”, “naturalized”, or “citizen by statute”.
Yes, birth is prima facie evidence of citizenship, but only the citizenship of the nation the father is a member.
Obama should be ARRESTED! He is UNIMPEACHABLE because he is NOT LEGALLY PRESIDENT no matter how many votes he got, but he can be PROSECUTED for treason. http://www.quowarranto.info/
Barack Hussein OBAMA – Not a natural born Citizen (NBC). His father was a foreign national and British Subject and was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama was seated due to FRAUD about his nativity story and the progressive domination and corruption in the main-stream media of the legal and constitutional meaning of NBC and due to the willful complicity and neglect of Congress. Obama’s father was a foreign national. His father was never a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. His father was only sojourning in the USA attending college, first in HI and then later at Harvard University in Massachusetts, and was deported back to Kenya at the request of Harvard University due to his unseemly activities there.
Obama was born in 1961. Obama himself claimed he was born in Kenya for many years in his various editions of his pre-2007 book agent’s biographies for him. After 2007 Obama claims he was born in HI but his birth registration there most likely was falsified by the maternal grandmother (to get her new grandson much desired and coveted U.S. Citizenship) since no official hospital record of his birth has been produced . A PDF version of an alleged long-form birth certificate has been posted online by Obama but it has been proved to be a computer manufactured forgery by AZ Sheriff Arpaio and his Lead Investigator Mike Zullo. They have also proved that Obama’s alleged draft registration card is a forgery too. The laws in HI were very lax in regards to registration of births. There is no independent evidence of Obama being born in HI. No pre-natal records and no post-natal records for his mother being in HI during the alleged birth month in 1961 have been found. No name of an attending physician, mid-wife, or paramedic called to the scene of a speculated home birth report exists. No independent witnesses to the claimed birth in Hawaii have ever been named or surfaced. No post-natal care records exist in Hawaii for the care of Obama’s mother or the child . In fact, there is no record at all for his mother even being in Hawaii in August 1961, the alleged month of Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii. No records exist of her being in HI for the 6 months prior to the alleged birth date. As to the much touted two newspaper announcements, false registration of a birth at home in HI with no witnesses would have generated the vital record in HI and also would have automatically generated the two newspaper ads. Those ads were placed automatically by the state as a result of ALL birth registrations – real or falsified! And to further contradict the Hawaiian birth nativity story of Obama, there are many accounts by Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and Kenyan and African newspapers — that Obama really was born in the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. And again, prior to 2007 Obama himself touted to the world that he was born in Kenya as exemplified by the book agent’s biography published and re-edited over many years as Obama’s career unfolded but always saying he was born in Kenya, up until 2007 when he decided to run for President and the massive scrubbing, forging, and re-creation of his life history and records began. No other President in history has had so many accounts attesting to his being foreign born and/or can provide NO contemporaneous birth witnesses or independent evidence to corroborate their subsequent claim to U.S. birth. There is a disinformation technique called “The Big Lie”. Obama is “The Big Lie”!
LikeLike
Patriot Pyro
October 9, 2015
Where is the logic here?
Can anyone give a reasonable answer?
First it’s take Obamacare or get fined cause its so good you get fined for not taking it!
Now he threatens to take away what we don’t want to start with if we don’t give up our guns.
Wow, ignorance at its finest!
He wants us to give up our guns yet has his kids surrounded with guns.
LikeLike
Elizabeth Lambert
October 9, 2015
Under the affordable healthcare act (obamacare)‘‘SEC. 2717 ø42 U.S.C. 300gg–17¿ ‘‘(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.—øAs
added by section 10101(e)(2)¿
‘‘(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.—A wellness
and health promotion activity implemented under subsection
(a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information
relating to—
‘‘(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully-possessed
firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property
of an individual; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm
or ammunition by an individual.
‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.—None of the authorities
provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that
Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the collection
of any information relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or
ammunition;
‘‘(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or
‘‘(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON DATABASES OR DATA BANKS.—None of
the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by
that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used to
maintain records of individual ownership or possession of a
firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON DETERMINATION OF PREMIUM RATES OR
ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE.—A premium rate may not
be increased, health insurance coverage may not be denied,
and a discount, rebate, or reward offered for participation in a
VerDate 0ct 09 2002 13:03 Jun 09, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 9001 Sfmt 6601 F:\P11\NHI\COMP\PPACACON.005 HOLCPC
June 9, 2010
21 Sec. 1001 PPACA (Consolidated) \2718 PHSA
wellness program may not be reduced or withheld under any
health benefit plan issued pursuant to or in accordance with
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment
made by that Act on the basis of, or on reliance upon—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or
ammunition; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use or storage of a firearm or ammunition.
‘‘(5) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR
INDIVIDUALS.—No individual shall be required to disclose any
information under any data collection activity authorized
under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an
amendment made by that Act relating to—
‘‘(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or
ammunition; or
‘‘(B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm
or ammunition.
‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment
of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Secretary
shall promulgate regulations that provide criteria for determining
whether a reimbursement structure is described in subsection
(a).
‘‘(e) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the
date on which regulations are promulgated under subsection (c),
the Government Accountability Office shall review such regulations
and conduct a study and submit to the Committee on Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report regarding
the impact the activities under this section have had on
the quality and cost of health care.
LikeLike
Elizabeth Lambert
October 9, 2015
So is he going to break his own law?
LikeLike
David Brown
October 9, 2015
Or rather he is saying that if you aren’t interested in gun control you can support the ACA as a means to address the real problem which is adequate mental health care. Take off the tinfoil hats please.
LikeLike
Larry
October 9, 2015
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Republicans generally don’t support Obamacare, Medicaid expansion, or so-called gun control. What’s his point? If he wanted some Republican support, he should have tied his gun control to taking away food stamps and welfare payments. Oh wait; this is Obama we’re talking about.
LikeLike
PKR
October 9, 2015
Are you serious??? Will he ever understand guns don’t kill , people do ? Hundreds of people are killed every year by drunk drivers, will he want our cars next?
LikeLike
A Lyn Hart
October 9, 2015
Anyone stupid enough to buy obamacare should not be handling a firearm anyway.
LikeLike
James
October 9, 2015
Eat a bag of Dick’s Obama and choke!!!!!!
LikeLike
durabo
October 9, 2015
BUCK OFAMA!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Frank Bromley
October 9, 2015
while you idiots rant and rave about guns god and gays there republicans and democrats are about to ship more jobs out of the country with another trade agreement !
LikeLike
David Anthony Hart
October 9, 2015
This clown acts like Executive Actions are his toy his plaything. He has used more executive actions than any 2 presidents together in history doesn’t anyone find this strange? Create a problem (covertly) wait for the reactions of the public (please save us something must be done) than offer a solution (Take ALL rights not just guns). I hate this dirtbag even though he is a puppet. I hate his masters & their agenda too.
LikeLike
Frank Bromley
October 9, 2015
people were shocked when the Drudge Report posted a giant picture of Hitler over a headline speculating that the White House will proceed with executive orders to limit access to firearms. The proposed orders are exceedingly tame, but Drudge’s reaction is actually a common conservative response to any invocation of gun control.
The NRA, Fox News, Fox News (again), Alex Jones, email chains, Joe “the Plumber” Wurzelbacher, Gun Owners of America, etc., all agree that gun control was critical to Hitler’s rise to power. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (“America’s most aggressive defender of firearms ownership”) is built almost exclusively around this notion, popularizing posters of Hitler giving the Nazi salute next to the text: “All in favor of ‘gun control’ raise your right hand.”
In his 1994 book, NRA head Wayne LaPierre dwelled on the Hitler meme at length, writing: “In Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed by Adolf Hitler.”
And it makes a certain amount of intuitive sense: If you’re going to impose a brutal authoritarian regime on your populace, better to disarm them first so they can’t fight back.
Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone’s guns is mostly bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesn’t make any sense at all if you think about it for more than a minute.
University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.
The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Besides, Omer Bartov, a historian at Brown University who studies the Third Reich, notes that the Jews probably wouldn’t have had much success fighting back. “Just imagine the Jews of Germany exercising the right to bear arms and fighting the SA, SS and the Wehrmacht. The [Russian] Red Army lost 7 million men fighting the Wehrmacht, despite its tanks and planes and artillery. The Jews with pistols and shotguns would have done better?” he told Salon.
Proponents of the theory sometimes point to the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto Uprising as evidence that, as Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano put it, “those able to hold onto their arms and their basic right to self-defense were much more successful in resisting the Nazi genocide.” But as the Tablet’s Michael Moynihan points out, Napolitano’s history (curiously based on a citation of work by French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson) is a bit off. In reality, only about 20 Germans were killed, while some 13,000 Jews were massacred. The remaining 50,000 who survived were promptly sent off to concentration camps.
Robert Spitzer, a political scientist who studies gun politics and chairs the political science department at SUNY Cortland, told Mother Jones’ Gavin Aronsen that the prohibition on Jewish gun ownership was merely a symptom, not the problem itself. “[It] wasn’t the defining moment that marked the beginning of the end for Jewish people in Germany. It was because they were persecuted, were deprived of all of their rights, and they were a minority group,” he explained.
Meanwhile, much of the Hitler myth is based on an infamous quote falsely attributed to the Fuhrer, which extols the virtue of gun control:
This year will go down in history! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!
The quote has been widely reproduced in blog posts and opinion columns about gun control, but it’s “probably a fraud and was likely never uttered,” according to Harcourt. “This quotation, often seen without any date or citation at all, suffers from several credibility problems, the most significant of which is that the date often given [1935] has no correlation with any legislative effort by the Nazis for gun registration, nor would there have been any need for the Nazis to pass such a law, since gun registration laws passed by the Weimar government were already in effect,” researchers at the useful website GunCite note.
advertisement
“As for Stalin,” Bartov continued, “the very idea of either gun control or the freedom to bear arms would have been absurd to him. His regime used violence on a vast scale, provided arms to thugs of all descriptions, and stripped not guns but any human image from those it declared to be its enemies. And then, when it needed them, as in WWII, it took millions of men out of the Gulags, trained and armed them and sent them to fight Hitler, only to send back the few survivors into the camps if they uttered any criticism of the regime.”
Bartov added that this misreading of history is not only intellectually dishonest, but also dangerous. “I happen to have been a combat soldier and officer in the Israeli Defense Forces and I know what these assault rifles can do,” he said in an email.
He continued: “Their assertion that they need these guns to protect themselves from the government — as supposedly the Jews would have done against the Hitler regime — means not only that they are innocent of any knowledge and understanding of the past, but also that they are consciously or not imbued with the type of fascist or Bolshevik thinking that they can turn against a democratically elected government, indeed turn their guns on it, just because they don’t like its policies, its ideology, or the color, race and origin of its leaders.”
LikeLike
chainsawhandz
October 9, 2015
Newsflash… Your precious 2nd Amendment isn’t part of the Constitution, it’s part of the Bill of Rights which are changes and clarifications to the imperfect, fluid document the Constitution is. The Constitution was made to be overthrown.
LikeLike
chainsawhandz
October 9, 2015
Newsflash, the Constitution is a fluid document made to be “overthrown.” What do you think Amendments are?
LikeLike
Ron Marquis
October 11, 2015
The constitution can be “overthrown”? I don’t know how a document can be “overthrown”. If you meant it can be modified, that’s true. If you’re proposing that the second amendment could be abolished or changed significantly to reduce gun rights, here’s the process:
“The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.”
Give it a try.
LikeLike
chainsawhandz
October 12, 2015
Yes, I am suggesting that the Constitution was created with a built-in system of modification. My choice of “overthrown” is in response to the article, which used the hyperbolic, paranoid phrase “over throw our Constitution” to describe attempts to pass gun control legislature. I assume that’s what it describe, at least–it’s a horribly written article.
LikeLike
Mason
October 9, 2015
I would never give my guns up not till I know when me and my family could walk and not get robbed or shot from a person in the street if I had a choice between health care from Obama and my guns I would choose my guns kuz I know they will keep my family’s and my health well protected for sure I can’t even depend on cops to save my life without thinking that they will kill me first before protecting me
LikeLike
Terry Gibbons
October 10, 2015
So…. He wants my guns if I want to keep my shitty healthcare, and if I choose my guns, then I will be fined for not having healthcare? So… in other words, I am being taxed massive amounts annually for having guns!!!!!!
LikeLike
E.P.
October 10, 2015
Thats not fair at all because not everyone has a gun and im damn sure those who dont need yur peace a shyt help could care less yu jus a faggit taking orders … Yu are a fool and will fall for your unrighteous acts ….yu and all other politicians / officials
LikeLike
cynthia bromback
October 11, 2015
Is there a video? I would like to hear this in Obama’s own words.
LikeLike
harleyrider1978
October 11, 2015
He can suck an islamic pig dick
LikeLike
Lauren
October 14, 2015
Even if this is true, I would rather lose my health care. It’s not like my family or I go to the hospital or doctors. Why get shots ? I mean they put things in the shots that can harm you. I rather keep my guns & any other weapon. President Obama & the Congress can shove it. God is on my side.
LikeLike
ellie
February 1, 2016
Get out of here. Are you for real?
People can buy their own Healthcare. No one can stop people from buying Healthcare. It’s a FREE Country, not just for your refugees and Muslims.
Americans have Rights.
It’s some people who need to be called out that need some mental attention.
And I am beginning to think Obama and a lot of Politicians that need it too.
All; of you need to put down your guns first if your Security everywhere and see what happens. You are supposed to be role models. There you go all you good examples are not more priority than anyone else in this life.
It does not go the way you make people think that your lives are no more important than snybodys life in this World. Politicians should stop the Bully Act.
That’s all its about.
Good morning to you too.
Vote Trump!
He is all in for the 2nd Amendment.
Its the Constitution of the USA
LikeLike
Sharron Miller
August 1, 2016
Obama care is a joke when you end up spending all you make on it or get fined at the end of the year. It is a good way to keep the poor poor aNd the rich richer. Keep your healthcare I will keep my guns.
LikeLike
Rjo
November 17, 2016
The IRONY of this is the association between the number of deaths due to gun violence and PREVENTABLE hospital mistakes!
Gun deaths: 30,000 per year (including suicides)
PREVENTABLE Hospital deaths: OVER 200,000 per year!!
LikeLike
Jim
November 18, 2016
What Healthcare
LikeLike