WP: “A federal appeals court has maintained the freeze on President Trump’s controversial immigration order, meaning previously barred refugees and citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries can continue entering the U.S.
A panel with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld the ruling of U.S. District Judge James Robart, who had decided Friday that Trump’s temporary travel ban should be put on hold. The Department of Homeland Security soon suspended all enforcement of Trump’s controversial directive.”
During the 8 years of Obama, when did WP, let alone any other liberal news media, define an Obama decision as controversial?
News reporting became a process of advancing liberal agenda with polls incorporating biased percentages of parties/sectors with general questions. The goal was not to report but to make news.
Last night WP goes on to define the 4-4 ideological SCOTUS split and the likelihood of a split decision bouncing back to the 9th Circuit ruling, never reporting anything about Obama’s 7 countries of terror and in the end just touching on why Trump made his decision for the safety of the American people.
The Emerson College Survey found 39% of the people trust news media, 49% trust the new White House.