Santorum, the candidate with no money, who won Iowa late, selected by libs and republicans to drop out, brought on the conservatism and facts in last night’s Florida debate, and put another nail in Obamaism worldwide. First tearing into ObamaCare he proceeded to global warming, putting the ducks neatly in sight and shooting them down. When the smoke cleared it was obvious why candidate Obama’s new platform was void of his last 3 years of accomplishments.
WSJ: “Speaking for many scientists and engineers who have looked carefully and independently at the science of climate, we have a message to any candidate for public office: There is no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to ‘decarbonize’ the world’s economy. Even if one accepts the inflated climate forecasts of the IPCC, aggressive greenhouse-gas control policies are not justified economically.”
We talked about the third green stimulus funded company to bite the dust earlier and WSJ discusses programs from other countries: “Spain’s government suspended subsidies for new renewable energy plants as part of the administration’s efforts to curb the budget deficit. The government today passed a decree that will halt subsidies for new wind, solar, co-generation or waste incineration plants, as it bids to rein in electric system debts that reached 24 billion euros ($31 billion).”
SUVs are no longer about keeping the family safe let alone providing safe driving in poor weather conditions, they intrude upon our precious animals. These vehicles create CO2, the same substance both the animals and and we exhale with each breath. Regardless of our desire to drive them, Obama is personally against it.
Santorum speaks not only for the scientists who who find no credence in the theory but for the people as well. The same with health care. He does so just as one would expect from any leader representing the people. Refreshing.
.
Follow
.
Michael Johnson
January 27, 2012
Scientists agree that global warming is real…
reason.com
What to do about is another question.