Obama has proven he likes to have things his way. Bipartisanship and listening to the people were lies from the start. What was not passed during the first 2 years of total liberal control was bypassed with Obama’s signature. Carney: “…only the most ‘fervent partisan’ would suggest the 8 million plus jobs lost in this recession were lost because of actions Barack Obama took.” Large sectors of his support, women, blacks, and libs, fell to a new low in a recent Gallup poll. Fervent partisans?
News media followers remain on the edge of their seats in anticipation of the forthcoming jobs speech, somehow scheduled in conflict with the GOP debate on NBC. The GOP debate was schedule long, long ago and the jobs speech date was announced this afternoon. As stated, Obama has proven he likes to have things his way.
Consider the Gallup results, why shouldn’t those people have the opportunity to listen to Obama alternatives? Why would Boehner elect to participate? The NFL opener is Thursday evening, guess which network. How would people react if he attempted to preempt it?
The AT&T merger was guaranteed to create more jobs inside the states by returning employees from out of the country and increasing within. Unlike Obama Care, Obama has filed against. He isn’t pro-jobs. He does not want the people listening to opposition which wants to create them. How can one be partisan by blaming Obama for unemployment? Where will they be created in the next 4 years?